Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 20:56
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Do ya think Taylor Swift worships the devil?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
OnePlus Watch 3 gets a smaller 43mm size alongside new Buds 4 in the US next month - 9to5Google
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The #1 Underrated Food to Increase Your Magnesium Intake, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Do most narcissists have good intentions as long as you are under their control?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
‘Marathon’ NDA Alpha Leaks Show Visual Improvements, Detail New Additions - Forbes